Background Materials

Background Materials > Workshop #2
 
Workshop #2: Codes of Conduct
Select Codes, Guidelines and Report
Association Codes
  1. Bahrain, Bahrain Society of Engineers. Bahrain Society of Engineers Code of Ethics: Bahrain Society of Engineers; n/d. http://www.mohandis.org/en-US/Code_Of_Ethics.aspx
  2. India, Computer Society of India. Computer Society of India Code of Ethics: Computer Society of India; n/d. http://www.csi-india.org/web/csi/code-of-ethics
  3. International, International Association for Dental Research. International Association for Dental Research Code of Ethics: International Association for Dental Research; 2009. http://www.dentalresearch.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3562
  4. New Zealand, New Zealand Psychological Society. Code of Ethics for Psychologists Working in Aotearoa/New Zealand: New Zealand Psychological Society; 2002. http://www.psychologistsboard.org.nz/pdfs/Forms%20from%203.7.06/Copy%20of%20CODE%20OF%20ETHICS%202002.pdf
  5. Norway, Norwegian Institute of Biomedical Science. Ethics for Biomedical Laboratory Scientists: Norwegian Institute of Biomedical Science; 2006. http://www.nito.no/dm/public/115266.PDF
  6. Singapore, Singapore Psychological Society. Singapore Psychological Society Code of Professional Ethics: Singapore Psychological Society; n/d. http://www.singaporepsychologicalsociety.org/code.cfm
  7. South Africa, Computer Society of South Africa. Computer Society of South Africa Code of Conduct: Computer Society of South Africa; n/d. http://www.cssa.org.za/page.php?p_id=1
  8. United Kingdom, British Psychological Society. British Psychological Society Code of Conduct: British Psychological Society; 2009. http://www.bps.org.uk/document-download-area/document-download$.cfm?file_uuid=E6917759-9799-434A-F313-9C35698E1864&ext=pdf
  9. United Kingdom, Wellcome Trust. Guidelines on Good Research Practice: Including Statement on the Handling of Allegations of Research Misconduct. London: Wellcome Trust; 2005, first published 2002. www.wellcome.ac.uk
  10. United States, American Educational Research Association. Ethical Standards of the American Educational Research Association: American Educational Research Association; 1992, rev. 1996 and 2000. http://www.aera.net/uploadedFiles/About_AERA/Ethical_Standards/EthicalStandards.pdf
  11. United States, American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Code of Ethics: American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; n/d. http://www.asbmb.org/Page.aspx?id=70&terms=ethics
  12. United States, American Society of Civil Engineers. American Society of Civil Engineers Code of Ethics: American Society of Civil Engineers; 1914, rev. 2006. http://www.asce.org/Content.aspx?id=7231
  13. United States, American Society of Human Genetics. American Society of Human Genetics Code of Ethics: American Society of Human Genetics; 2006. http://www.ashg.org/pages/about_ethics.shtml
  14. United States, Association for the Study of Higher Education. Association for the Study of Higher Education Principles of Ethical Conduct: Association for the Study of Higher Education; 2003. http://www.ashe.ws/?page=180
  15. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: World Medical Association; 1964. http://www.wma.net/en/10home/index.html

  16. Institutional Codes
  17. Austria, Medical University of Graz. Medical University of Graz Standards of Good Practice: Medical University of Graz; 2005. http://www.meduni-graz.at/images/content/file/forschung/gsp/GSP_Standards.pdf
  18. Hungary, University CE. Code of Ethics of Central European University: Central European University; 2003. http://www.ceu.hu/sites/default/files/CoE_March2010.pdf
  19. India, Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes. Ethical Guidelines for Social Science Research in Health: Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes; 2000. http://www.cehat.org/publications/ethical.html#2
  20. United Kingdom, Belfast QsUi. Queen's University Belfast Code of Good Conduct in Research: Queen's University in Belfast; 2007. http://www.nicent.qub.ac.uk/download/code_conduct_research_Oct03.doc
  21. United States, University of Connecticut. Code of Conduct: University of Connecticut: University of Connecticut; n/d. http://www.audit.uconn.edu/doc/codeofconduct.pdf
  22. United States, University of Minnesota. University of Minnesota Code of Conduct: University of Minnesota; 1966, rev. 2006. http://www1.umn.edu/regents/policies/academic/Code_of_Conduct.html

  23. International
  24. Europe, ALL European Academies (ALLEA). Memorandum on Scientific Integrity: ALLEA; 2003. http://www.allea.org/Content/ALLEA/Themes/Scientific%20Integrity/Memorandum_Scientific_Integrity.pdf
  25. European Union, European Commission. European Charter for Researchers and Code of Conduct for Recruitment of Researchers: European Commission; 2005. http://ec.europa.eu/eracareers/pdf/am509774CEE_EN_E4.pdf
  26. European Union, European Commission. Code of Conduct for Responsible Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies Research: European Commission; 2008. http://ec.europa.eu/nanotechnology/pdf/nanocode-rec_pe0894c_en.pdf
  27. International, OECD. Best practices for ensuring scientific integrity and preventing misconduct: OECD; 2007. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/37/17/40188303.pdf
  28. International, UNESCO. Social Science Conduct Code: UNESCO; 2004. http://portal.unesco.org/shs/en/files/6497/10951456011Soc_Sci_Code.pdf/Soc_Sci_Code.pdf
  29. International, UNESCO. Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: UNESCO; 2005. http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
  30. UK Research Integrity Office. Recommended Checklist for Researchers. London: UK RIO; [n.d.]. http://www.ukrio.org/resources/UKRIO Recommended Checklist for Researchers.pdf
  31. National Academy of Sciences. Committee on the Conduct of Science. On Being a Scientist: Responsible Conduct in Research. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2009. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12192&page=1

  32. National Codes
  33. Germany, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft: Commission on Professional Self Regulation in Science. Proposals for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft: Commission on Professional Self Regulation in Science; 1998. http://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/dfg_im_profil/reden_stellungnahmen/download/self_regulation_98.pdf
  34. Japan, Science Council of Japan. Code of Conduct for Scientists: Science Council of Japan; 2006. http://www.scj.go.jp/ja/info/kohyo/pdf/kohyo-20-s3e-1.pdf
  35. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research: National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia; 2007. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/publications/synopses/r39.pdf
  36. Nepal, Nepal Health Research Council. National Ethical Guidelines for Health Research in Nepal: Nepal Health Research Council; 2001. http://www.nhrc.org.np/guidelines/index.php
  37. Netherlands, Association of Universities in the Netherlands. The Netherlands Code of Conduct for Scientific Practice: Association of Universities in the Netherlands; 2004. http://www.vsnu.nl/web/show/id=75803/langid=42/contentid=1095
  38. Nigeria, National Health Research Ethics Committee of Nigeria. National Code of Health Research Ethics: National Health Research Ethics Committee of Nigeria; 2007. http://www.nhrec.net/nhrec/code.html
  39. Poland, Polish Academy of Sciences. Good Manners in Science: A Set of Principles and Guidelines: Polish Academy of Sciences; 2001. http://www.ken.pan.pl/images/stories/pliki/goodmanners.pdf
  40. Saudi Arabia, Saudi Arabia Research Advisory Council. Research Ethics Committee Guidelines and Policies Manual: Saudi Arabia Research Advisory Council; 2000. http://rc.kfshrc.edu.sa/ORA/Forms/Guidelines/RAC%20Research%20Ethics%20Committee%20Guidelines%20&%20Policies.pdf
  41. Sweden, Scientists in Sweden. Uppsala Code of Ethics for Scientists: Scientists in Sweden; 1984. http://user.it.uu.se/~pugwash/Etik/uppsalakodex.html
  42. United Kingdom, UK Research Integrity Office. Code of Practice for Research. Promoting Good Practice and Preventing Misconduct.: UK Research Integrity Office; 2009. http://www.ukrio.org/resources/UKRIO%20Code%20of%20Practice%20for%20Research.pdf
  43. * 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity, Singapore Statement, working draft. https://www.wcri2010.org/reg/login.asp

  44. Reports
  45. European Science Foundation. Stewards of Integrity: Institutional Approaches to Promote and Safeguard Good Research Practice in Europe. Strassbourg: ESF; April 2008. http://www.esf.org/
  46. * European Science Foundation, Member Organisation Forum. Executive Report: Fostering Research Integrity in Europe. Strassbourg: ESF; 2010. http://www.esf.org
  47. Evers K. Codes of Conduct: Standards for Ethics in Research. Brussels: European Commission; 2003. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/codes_conduct_en.pdf
  48. European Science Foundation, Member Organisation Member Forum on Scientific Integrity, Working Group 2, Guidelines for Good Practice Rules, from Code of Conduct for Scientific Integrity; [2010].