Background Materials

Background Materials > Workshop #1
 
Workshop #1: Planning and training for Misconduct Investigations
  1. Grant G, Guyton O, Forrester R. Creating Effective Research Compliance Programs in Academic Institutions. Acad Med. Sep 1999;74(9):951-971.
  2. Office of the President. Office of Science and Technology Policy. Federal Policy on Research Misconduct 2000. http://ori.dhhs.gov/html/policies/fed_research_misconduct.asp
  3. National Advisory Board on Research Ethics. Good Scientific Practice and Procedures for Handling Misconduct and Fraud in Science 2002. http://www.tenk.fi/eng/Publicationsguidelines/htkeng.pdf
  4. National Science Foundation. Research Misconduct 2002. http://www.nsf.gov/oig/resmisreg.pdf
  5. United States Sentencing Commission. Report of the Ad Hoc Advisory Group on the Organizational Sentencing Guidelines October 7 2003. http://www.ussc.gov/corp/advgrprpt/advgrprpt.htm
  6. The Business-Higher Education Forum Embedding Ethics in Business and Higher Education: From Leadership to Management Imperative June 2005. http://www.bhef.com/publications/documents/embedding_ethics_05.pdf
  7. United Kingdom, Wellcome Trust. Guidelines on Good Research Practice: Including Statement on the Handling of Allegations of Research Misconduct. London: Wellcome Trust; 2005, first published 2002. http://www.wellcome.ac.uk
  8. Ethics Resource Center. Defining the Role of the Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer. Arlington, VA: Ethics Resource Center; 2007. http://www.ethics.org/files/u5/CECO_Paper_UPDATED.pdf
  9. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. Preventing Misconduct in Research Activities 2007. http://www.jsps.go.jp/english/
  10. International, OECD. Best practices for ensuring scientific integrity and preventing misconduct: OECD; 2007. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/37/17/40188303.pdf
  11. European Science Foundation. Stewards of Integrity: Institutional Approaches to Promote and Safeguard Good Research Practice in Europe. Strassbourg: ESF; April 2008. http://www.esf.org/
  12. Nanyang Technological University. NTU Research Integrity Policy and Procedures. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University; 28 February 2008. http://www3.ntu.edu.sg/Research2/ResearchIntegrityPolicy.pdf
  13. National University of Singapore. NUS Code & Procedures on Research Integrity (For Academic & Research Staff). Singapore: National University of Singapore; 19 February 2008. http://www.nus.edu.sg/research/Research_Integrity.pdf
  14. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Global Science Forum. Final Report, Co-ordinating Committee for Facilitating International Research Misconduct Investigations. Paris: OECD, GSF; 2008. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/29/4/42713295.pdf
  15. UK Research Integrity Office. Procedure for the Investigation of Misconduct in Research. London: UK RIO; August 2008. http://www.ukrio.org/sites/ukrio2/the_programme_of_work/index.cfm
  16. Council on Government Relations. Managing Externally funded Research Programs; A Guide to Effective Management Practices. Washington, DC: CGS; July 2009. http://www.cogr.edu/restricted/viewDoc.cfm?DocID=151537
  17. Ethics Resource Center. The Importance of Ethical Culture: Increasing Trust and Driving Down Risks. Arlington, VA: Ethis Resource Center; 2009. http://www.ethics.org/files/u5/CultureSup4.pdf
  18. European Science Foundation. Member Organisation Forum: Fostering Research Integrity in Europe. Strasbourg: Euopean Science Foundation; 2010. http://www.esf.org/
  19. US Department of Health & Human Service, Office of Inspector General. Compliance Guidance: HHS IG; [n.d.]. http://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/complianceguidance.asp
  20. * ENRIO. Terms of Reference for the European Network of Research Integrity Offices (ENRIO): ENRIO; n.d.